WebA triangular graphic representing a "hierarchy of disagreement" from clear refutation to mere vituperation, based on the essay "How to Disagree" by Paul Graham. French Un graphique triangulaire représentant une … WebAlthough originally written as a simple list, Graham's hierarchy can be represented as a pyramid with the most convincing form of disagreement at the top, and the weakest at the bottom. Graham notes that articulate forms of name-calling ("The author is a self-important dilettante.") are no different from crude insults, in this hierarchy."

Session name HIERARCHY OF DISAGREEMENT Objectives

WebGraham's Hierarchy of Disagreement. rumble. comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment Top posts of August 23, 2024 ... WebAug 18, 2024 · When you discuss a topic and everyone agrees, the conversation often dies out quickly. But when you disagree, you're putting yourself in opposition to what w... highfields builder pty ltd

Updated Hierarchy of Disagreement - LessWrong

WebDec 1, 2024 · Graham’s essay is worth reading as a useful way to categorize disagreements. Whenever you watch a video or read an article, blog post, book, etc., consider Graham’s hierarchy of disagreement. A key point: “The most convincing form of disagreement is refutation. It’s also the rarest, because it’s the most work. WebAug 14, 2024 · In it Graham graphically represents the "hierarchy of discrepancy", which shows the different levels at which a person can express their disagreement or disagreement with any topic. However, before explaining what this hierarchy is about and how it is organized, it is necessary to know what the discrepancy consists of and how its … WebGraham also suggested that the hierarchy can be thought of as a pyramid, as the highest forms of disagreement are rarer. Following this hierarchy, Graham notes that articulate forms of name-calling (e.g., "The author is … how hot is a propane flame